Dr. Malone's name is on all the early patents for the mRNA platform. According to his wife, Dr. Malone was the first to realize that the mRNA transfections were causing an immune response. Malone summarized his contributions to the technology at his substack, here:
He also points to an essay by his wife, who documents the precise timeline of the discovery and Dr. Malone's role. Specifically, according to Dr. Jill Glasspool Malone:
"At the Salk Institute/UCSD, he [Robert Malone] did his thesis work under Dr. Inder Verma on RNA structure and DNA/RNA gene transfer. The first realization that DNA in itself can produce an immune response was when Robert began collaborating with a post-doc in Verma’s lab by the name of Dr. Daniel St. Louis in 1987. Dr. St. Louis was working on a hemophilia gene therapy model in rabbits using retro-viral transduction techniques. Dr. St. Louis kept having gene expression stop at about two to three weeks post-treatment and he was sure that this loss of gene expression had to do with the promoter he was using. Dr. St. Louis talked with Robert Malone and Robert got obsessed with this puzzle and spent day and night poring over Dan's data, medical texts and journals. Then, he had a brainstorm. What was going on was that immune responses were shutting down gene expression. It had nothing to do with the promoter Dr. St. Louis was using. He presented all of his work and thoughts to Dr. St. Louis. This was the intellectual exercise that led to Robert discovering RNA and DNA vaccines at that time. Note that Robert is acknowledged in the St. Luis paper (St Louis D, Verma IM. An alternative approach to somatic cell gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 May;85(9):3150-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.9.3150. PMID: 3283738; PMCID: PMC280161).
"In fact, Robert talked with me extensively about using retroviral vectors for genetic vaccination during this time, but thought that the dangers of retroviral vectors were too great and that the FDA would not allow for this to be licensed. However, this intellectual challenge led to this idea of using DNA and RNA delivery for vaccines. By spring 1988, his ideas about DNA and RNA vaccination were cohesive and formed the basis for the research plan that Vical later developed.
"As a witness to what these ideas represented and the timeline of when the ideas and experiments were performed, I know that Robert was obsessed with gene transfer and immune responses long before he went to work for Vical in 1989. Robert’s first paper on RNA/cationic liposome transfection (PNAS) (which now has 747 citations) as well as published papers on RNA/DNA/cationic liposome transfection and embryonic transfection, were researched and written in 1988. I even have a journal entry dated in 1988, where I write briefly of Robert’s ideas regarding genetic vaccination."
I agree that Malone did not invent the idea of using injected mRNA to create a transfection, nor did he invent the use of a lipid container for the mRNA -- although he was certainly involved in the lab work to implement these inventions, and his name is on the patents. His most important claim to fame here, is that he came up with the idea of using the technology for purposes similar to traditional vaccination.
Since all of this happened in 1988, it's also important to note that Dr. Malone has had a distinguished career in vaccine development since then. There is no board specialization or residency in vaccinology, which is a distinct field of endeavor. Malone's education and experience make him an imminently qualified specialist in this field. Malone's CV is at this link:
Which brings us to Dr. Malone's claims in the video posted to "The Kick Them All Out Project". In this video, Dr. Malone says that the UK is "normalizing" broad-based testing for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). This syndrome is characterized by high rates of opportunistic infectious diseases and cancers. Malone goes on to say that a wide variety of evidence is pointing to alarming increases in cancer rates in populations subjected to the covid-19 injections. This includes data from Ryan Cole; from the DOD data released by Thomas Renz; and actuarial data released by multiple insurance companies.
Dr. Patmas, how do you know that the injections are safe, and don't cause AIDS or cancer? Where is your data to the contrary?
Why is it unprofessional conduct, to discuss data? Isn't this a constitutionally protected free speech right?
Dr. Malone's name is on all the early patents for the mRNA platform. According to his wife, Dr. Malone was the first to realize that the mRNA transfections were causing an immune response. Malone summarized his contributions to the technology at his substack, here:
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/bushwhacked-by-alex-berenson-on-fox
He also points to an essay by his wife, who documents the precise timeline of the discovery and Dr. Malone's role. Specifically, according to Dr. Jill Glasspool Malone:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/617d909092cd2314e37ebe67/t/617de3cd04bffe53342539cb/1635640269719/Jill%27s+letter+about+RNA+vaccination+generic+v5+June2021.pdf
"At the Salk Institute/UCSD, he [Robert Malone] did his thesis work under Dr. Inder Verma on RNA structure and DNA/RNA gene transfer. The first realization that DNA in itself can produce an immune response was when Robert began collaborating with a post-doc in Verma’s lab by the name of Dr. Daniel St. Louis in 1987. Dr. St. Louis was working on a hemophilia gene therapy model in rabbits using retro-viral transduction techniques. Dr. St. Louis kept having gene expression stop at about two to three weeks post-treatment and he was sure that this loss of gene expression had to do with the promoter he was using. Dr. St. Louis talked with Robert Malone and Robert got obsessed with this puzzle and spent day and night poring over Dan's data, medical texts and journals. Then, he had a brainstorm. What was going on was that immune responses were shutting down gene expression. It had nothing to do with the promoter Dr. St. Louis was using. He presented all of his work and thoughts to Dr. St. Louis. This was the intellectual exercise that led to Robert discovering RNA and DNA vaccines at that time. Note that Robert is acknowledged in the St. Luis paper (St Louis D, Verma IM. An alternative approach to somatic cell gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 May;85(9):3150-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.9.3150. PMID: 3283738; PMCID: PMC280161).
"In fact, Robert talked with me extensively about using retroviral vectors for genetic vaccination during this time, but thought that the dangers of retroviral vectors were too great and that the FDA would not allow for this to be licensed. However, this intellectual challenge led to this idea of using DNA and RNA delivery for vaccines. By spring 1988, his ideas about DNA and RNA vaccination were cohesive and formed the basis for the research plan that Vical later developed.
"As a witness to what these ideas represented and the timeline of when the ideas and experiments were performed, I know that Robert was obsessed with gene transfer and immune responses long before he went to work for Vical in 1989. Robert’s first paper on RNA/cationic liposome transfection (PNAS) (which now has 747 citations) as well as published papers on RNA/DNA/cationic liposome transfection and embryonic transfection, were researched and written in 1988. I even have a journal entry dated in 1988, where I write briefly of Robert’s ideas regarding genetic vaccination."
I agree that Malone did not invent the idea of using injected mRNA to create a transfection, nor did he invent the use of a lipid container for the mRNA -- although he was certainly involved in the lab work to implement these inventions, and his name is on the patents. His most important claim to fame here, is that he came up with the idea of using the technology for purposes similar to traditional vaccination.
Since all of this happened in 1988, it's also important to note that Dr. Malone has had a distinguished career in vaccine development since then. There is no board specialization or residency in vaccinology, which is a distinct field of endeavor. Malone's education and experience make him an imminently qualified specialist in this field. Malone's CV is at this link:
https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Robert-W-Malone-CV-July-2021.pdf
Which brings us to Dr. Malone's claims in the video posted to "The Kick Them All Out Project". In this video, Dr. Malone says that the UK is "normalizing" broad-based testing for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). This syndrome is characterized by high rates of opportunistic infectious diseases and cancers. Malone goes on to say that a wide variety of evidence is pointing to alarming increases in cancer rates in populations subjected to the covid-19 injections. This includes data from Ryan Cole; from the DOD data released by Thomas Renz; and actuarial data released by multiple insurance companies.
Dr. Patmas, how do you know that the injections are safe, and don't cause AIDS or cancer? Where is your data to the contrary?
Why is it unprofessional conduct, to discuss data? Isn't this a constitutionally protected free speech right?