https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00011-7/fulltext
The fake expert doctors of disinformation have touted Hydroxychoroquine and Ivermectin as effective early treatment for COVID.
They are wrong. There is no QUALITY evidence published in any QUALITY medical journal to support that contention. All the QUALITY evidence suggests HCQ and IVM are ineffective at best and more likely dangerous.
That hasn't stopped the fake experts from issuing their guidelines for early treatment which are complete speculation without an evidence base.
Meanwhile there is an effective early treatment, PAXLOVID. Why is it that the public is aware of ineffective drugs but not an effective drug? Why are there barriers to PAXLOVID treatment?
PAXLOVID consistently demonstrates efficacy in reducing progression to serious disease yet many patients are unaware of it and a lot of doctors are not prescribing it.
What isn't America's Front Line Doctors recommending PAXLOVID? After all, they are not opposed to medications for COVID, just vaccination, right?
Don't you find it odd, the antivaxx doctors who are all about early treatment don't have much to say about Paxlovid which is proven effective early treatment?. PAXLOVID is not a vaccine. So why are they ignoring that medication? Why isn't PAXLOVID the drug they are recommending?
The reason is they are not motivated by science or logic. They psychologically predisposed to oppose anything that comes from an authority. They reject it. They reject expertise. They embrace that which is contrarian. It's part of the peculiar psychological characteristics of antivaxxers that was well described by Murphy et al in Nature.
What do you need early treatment for when you have a perfectly safe and effective "vaccine?" This other garbage produced (and ridiculously heavily advertised all day every day by Pfizer: "ask your doctor if Paxlovid is right for you," yeah sure the public doesn't know about, hilarious) is worse than nothing, just like their failed clot shot. From this study: "Real-world observations have postulated a nirmatrelvir–ritonavir rebound effect, whereby patients might have an increase in viral load or recurrent symptoms after treatment." Why would anybody take a "treatment" that makes your condition worse? Probably the same suckers that would take a jab that makes you at least three times more likely to become ill (or die.)